AFFECT PROBABILITY JUDGMENT ? THE DISCRIMINATION BIAS Amber Sprenger
نویسندگان
چکیده
Title of thesis: CAN IRRELEVANT ALTERNATIVES AFFECT PROBABILITY JUDGMENT? THE DISCRIMINATION BIAS Amber Sprenger, Master of Science, 2005 Thesis directed by: Professor Michael Dougherty Department of Psychology In this paper we used a proactive interference (PI) paradigm to examine the effect of generating irrelevant alternative hypotheses on probability judgments. Two possible effects of generating irrelevant alternative hypotheses on probability judgment were tested: discrimination failure and inhibition failure. The discrimination failure account predicted that participants would fail to identify irrelevant alternatives as irrelevant, causing them to include irrelevant alternatives in their judgments. Then, the magnitude and relative accuracy of participants’ probability judgments would decrease as PI increases. The inhibition failure account predicted that participants would identify irrelevant alternatives as irrelevant, but would fail to inhibit them from working memory. Then, the magnitude of participants’ probability judgments would increase as PI increases, but that the relative accuracy of the probability judgments would be unaffected by the build-up of PI. Three experiments support the discrimination failure account of the effect of PI on probability judgment. CAN IRRELEVANT ALTERNATIVES AFFECT PROBABILITY JUDGMENT? THE DISCRIMINATION BIAS
منابع مشابه
The influence of improper sets of information on judgment: how irrelevant information can bias judged probability.
This article introduces 2 new sources of bias in probability judgment, discrimination failure and inhibition failure, which are conceptualized as arising from an interaction between error prone memory processes and a support theory like comparison process. Both sources of bias stem from the influence of irrelevant information on participants' probability judgments, but they postulate different ...
متن کاملImplications of Cognitive Load for Hypothesis Generation and Probability Judgment
We tested the predictions of HyGene (Thomas et al., 2008) that both divided attention at encoding and judgment should affect the degree to which participants' probability judgments violate the principle of additivity. In two experiments, we showed that divided attention during judgment leads to an increase in subadditivity, suggesting that the comparison process for probability judgments is cap...
متن کاملDiagnostic hypothesis generation and human judgment.
Diagnostic hypothesis-generation processes are ubiquitous in human reasoning. For example, clinicians generate disease hypotheses to explain symptoms and help guide treatment, auditors generate hypotheses for identifying sources of accounting errors, and laypeople generate hypotheses to explain patterns of information (i.e., data) in the environment. The authors introduce a general model of hum...
متن کاملDifferences between probability and frequency judgments : The role of individual differences in working memory capacity q
Most theories of probability judgment assume that judgments are made by comparing the strength of a focal hypothesis relative to the strength of alternative hypotheses. In contrast, research suggests that frequency judgments are assessed using a non-comparative process; the strength of the focal hypothesis is assessed without comparing it to the strength of alternative hypotheses. We tested thi...
متن کاملOpinion Aggregation and Individual Expertise
Group judgments are often influenced by their members’ individual expertise. It is less clear, though, how individual expertise should affect the group judgments. This paper surveys a wide range of formal models of opinion aggregation and group judgment: models where all group members have the same impact on the group judgment, models that take into account differences in individual accuracy, a...
متن کامل